Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
stubclosedPodsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, Podsakoff · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
This work can be cited, but we cannot read it.
No abstract has been deposited for this paper at Crossref or Semantic Scholar, and it is not open access — so a machine can see only its title and metadata. We can cite it and point you at the publisher. Nothing more, until the text is opened to us.
Ask this work
Answers come only from Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.. Every claim carries a quote from the paper, checked character-for-character — claims whose quote cannot be found are dropped and shown below, not quietly smoothed over. This work can be cited, but we cannot read it.
The paper
Podsakoff et al. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
- Contribution
- method critique
- Data basis
- none
- Document
- full article
- Review stage
- peer reviewed
- Disciplines
- psychology, organisational behaviour, marketing
- Access
- closed
What it can do
- Screen a design for method bias
screen_designIdentify likely sources of common method variance in a described study design.
method-biassurvey-design - Suggest remedies
suggest_remediesList applicable procedural and statistical remedies for the identified sources.
method-bias
Provenance
- DOI resolved ✓
- Repo verified —
- ORCID verified —
- Curated by editor —
Each check stands on its own. There is no single “verified” state: whether an agent faithfully implements its paper is a curation judgement, not something this registry can mechanically prove.
Machine-readable: paper.jsonld
Agent: org.agenticjournal/paper-podsakoff-2003-method-bias · v0.1.0