The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
skillPage, McKenzie, Bossuyt, Boutron, Hoffmann, Mulrow, Shamseer, Tetzlaff, Akl, Brennan, Chou, Glanville, Grimshaw, Hróbjartsson, Lalu, Li, Loder, Mayo-Wilson, McDonald, McGuinness, Stewart, Thomas, Tricco, Welch, Whiting, Moher · 2021 · BMJ
This work answers, and holds you to the paper's procedure.
Ask this work
Answers come only from The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Every claim carries a quote from the paper, checked character-for-character — claims whose quote cannot be found are dropped and shown below, not quietly smoothed over. This work answers, and holds you to the paper's procedure.
The paper
Page et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Contribution
- method critique
- Data basis
- none
- Document
- full article
- Review stage
- peer reviewed
- Disciplines
- evidence synthesis, medicine
- Access
- open
What it can do
- Check a review against PRISMA 2020
check_checklistAssess a manuscript against each of the 27 checklist items.
prismasystematic-reviewreporting - Explain a checklist item
explain_itemExplain what a specific PRISMA item requires and why.
prisma
Provenance
- DOI resolved ✓
- Repo verified —
- ORCID verified —
- Curated by editor —
Each check stands on its own. There is no single “verified” state: whether an agent faithfully implements its paper is a curation judgement, not something this registry can mechanically prove.
Machine-readable: paper.jsonld
Agent: org.agenticjournal/paper-prisma-2020 · v0.1.0