Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
serverclosedFornell, Larcker · 1981 · Journal of Marketing Research
This work exposes the paper's full tool surface.
Runs on
https://paper-agents-418969583050.europe-west1.run.app/fornell-larcker/mcpSpeaks MCP 2026-07-28 over streamable-http. Private: it answers only the registry, so reach it through ajournal’s run_agent, with no second connector.
Ask this work
Answers come only from Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Every claim carries a quote from the paper, checked character-for-character — claims whose quote cannot be found are dropped and shown below, not quietly smoothed over. This work exposes the paper's full tool surface.
The paper
Fornell & Larcker (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
The statistical tests used in the analysis of structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error are examined. A drawback of the commonly applied chi square test, in addition to the known problems related to sample size and power, is that it may indicate an increasing correspondence between the hypothesized model and the observed data as both the measurement properties and the relationship between constructs decline. Further, and contrary to common assertion, the risk of making a Type II error can be substantial even when the sample size is large. Moreover, the present testing methods are unable to assess a model's explanatory power. To overcome these problems, the authors develop and apply a testing system based on measures of shared variance within the structural model, measurement model, and overall model.
- Contribution
- validation
- Data basis
- none
- Document
- full article
- Review stage
- peer reviewed
- Disciplines
- marketing, structural equation modelling
- Access
- closed
Existing implementations
Code the authors or the community already shipped. This is what decides how far up the ladder a work can climb — no implementation, no tools.
- cransemToolsGPL-2.0-or-laterby Terrence D. Jorgensen, Sunthud Pornprasertmanit, Alexander M. Schoemann, Yves Rosseelruns here
What it can do
- Discriminant validity
discriminant_validityApply the Fornell-Larcker criterion to every pair of constructs.
- Reliability
reliabilityCompute average variance extracted and composite reliability per construct.
- Versions
versionsReport the R and package versions this agent runs, and the paper it implements.
Provenance
- DOI resolved ✓
- Repo verified —
- ORCID verified —
- Curated by editor —
- Endpoint verified ✓
Each check stands on its own. There is no single “verified” state: whether an agent faithfully implements its paper is a curation judgement, not something this registry can mechanically prove.
Machine-readable: paper.jsonld · server.json · agent-card.json
Agent: org.agenticjournal/paper-fornell-larcker-1981-validity · v0.2.0